An "attempt" charge exists because California law recognizes that taking real steps toward committing a crime — even one that's never completed — is still serious enough to warrant criminal liability. But the law also requires a meaningful line between planning and actually attempting, and where that line falls is often the central issue in these cases.
What the Law Actually Requires
Under Penal Code § 664[1], an attempt to commit a crime requires two elements: a specific intent to commit the underlying crime, and a direct — but ineffectual — act done toward its commission. The "direct act" requirement is what separates a criminal attempt from mere preparation; simply planning, discussing, or gathering materials for a crime generally isn't enough on its own.
Penalties Are Generally a Fraction of the Completed Crime
Under the same statute, an attempt is generally punished by half the term that would apply to the completed crime. For crimes punishable by life in prison or death, attempt instead carries a specific alternative term set by statute — but the general rule for most other offenses is that attempt liability is meaningfully less severe than the underlying completed offense would have been.
The "Direct Act" Requirement Is Usually the Central Dispute
Because California law requires more than mere preparation, courts look at how close the defendant actually came to completing the crime — whether the act taken was a substantial step beyond planning, or whether it stopped short of that threshold. A person who purchases materials that could be used for a crime hasn't necessarily attempted it; a person who takes the final identifiable step toward carrying it out likely has. Where a specific case falls on that spectrum is often genuinely disputed.
Abandonment Can Be a Defense in Some Circumstances
Where a person voluntarily and completely abandons their criminal purpose before completing the direct act required for attempt — and does so for reasons other than an external obstacle preventing completion — that abandonment can serve as a defense to the attempt charge. This is distinct from simply being unsuccessful or interrupted by circumstances outside the person's control.
Attempt Charges Often Arise From Police Sting Operations
Because attempt liability doesn't require the underlying crime to succeed, or even to be possible under the actual circumstances (a person can be convicted of attempted possession of a controlled substance from what turns out to be a fake substance provided by an undercover officer, for example), these charges frequently arise from law enforcement sting operations. In these cases, the specific conduct of law enforcement, and whether it induced the accused into taking steps they wouldn't otherwise have taken, can be a significant factor.
Specific Intent Is a Required Element, Not an Assumption
Because attempt requires specific intent to commit the underlying crime, the prosecution can't simply infer that intent from ambiguous conduct — it must be established through actual evidence, whether direct statements, planning materials, or the nature of the direct act itself.
Questions about your case? Call (323) 622-4951. Free, confidential, 24/7.
How Attempt Cases Move Through Chino Hills Courts
An attempt charge arising in Chino Hills is arraigned at the Rancho Cucamonga Justice Center[2], with the case generally following the same procedural track — including a preliminary hearing for felony-level attempt charges — as the underlying crime it's based on.
What an Attempt Defense Typically Examines
- Whether the alleged conduct actually amounts to a direct act toward the crime, or whether it remains mere preparation
- Whether the prosecution can establish specific intent to commit the underlying crime through actual evidence
- Whether a voluntary and complete abandonment of the criminal purpose occurred before any direct act was taken
- Whether law enforcement conduct in a sting-based case induced conduct that wouldn't otherwise have occurred
Frequently Asked Questions
Is planning a crime the same as attempting it?
No — attempt requires a direct act done toward the crime's commission, not just planning, discussion, or preparation. Where that line falls is often a central factual dispute in these cases.
Can I still be charged with attempt if the underlying crime was actually impossible to complete?
Yes — California courts have upheld attempt convictions even where the underlying crime was factually impossible to complete, such as in certain undercover sting scenarios.
Can changing my mind before finishing a crime be a defense?
Potentially, yes — voluntary and complete abandonment of the criminal purpose before the direct act is completed can serve as a defense, as long as it wasn't simply due to an external obstacle.
Facing an Attempted Crime Charge in Chino Hills?
Whether the alleged conduct crossed the line from preparation into a genuine attempt is often the deciding question. The Cespedes Law Firm, L.C. is headquartered in Chino Hills and represents clients in English and Spanish throughout California. Call (323) 622-4951 for a free consultation.
This page is provided for general information only and is not legal advice. Contact our office to discuss the specifics of your case.
